Approach | Description | Advantages | Disadvantages | Link/example |
---|---|---|---|---|
The ‘Beacon’ model | • A common web service allows researchers to discover data relevant to their research without the data holder storing the data outside the host institution | • Comparatively easy to implement | All those of share-on-request systems, including: | Being piloted by Global Alliance for Genomics and Health for genomics data https://genomicsandhealth.org/work-products-demonstration-projects/beacon-project-0 |
• Can improve discoverability of clinical datasets which cannot be openly shared | • Lack of data preservation guarantees | |||
• No independent governance of data requests | ||||
• No common system for citing datasets | ||||
The ‘Federation’ model | • Separate, locally controlled data resources share a common index and data transfer protocols | • Improved data preservation over the Beacon model | • Data preservation relies on multiple partner nodes. | Global Alzheimer’s Association Interactive Network (GAAIN) [40] http://www.gaain.org/ |
• Easier for institutions and ethical committees to accept because data holder does not give up control of the data to an independent repository | • No independent governance of data requests | |||
• Terms for anonymous peer review of data, if permitted, would likely need to be negotiated with each node independently | ||||
• Linking with the literature possible if stable data identifiers are used across the whole network | ||||
The ‘Iron-safe’ model | • Data stored in a hardened, centralised resource and analysis conducted within the confines of the system | • Appropriate for highly sensitive data collected in the course of clinical care | • Access barriers may be prohibitive | Planned for 100,000 English Genomes system (http://www.genomicsengland.co.uk/the-100000-genomes-project/data/) |
• Anonymous peer review of data generally impossible | ||||
• A centralised resource can, in principle, provide an independent system for vetting and providing access, helping avoid the creep of biasing access requirements like co-authorship | ||||
• Difficult to link data with literature in a robust manner, if the index of the data resource is also protected | ||||
Also, similar to the Clinical Study Data Request (CSDR) model | ||||
• Data export from the system is limited and tightly controlled |