Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant demographics

From: A structured, journal-led peer-review mentoring program enhances peer review training

 

Mentees (n = 55)

Mentors (n = 38)a

Female, n (%)

31 (56%)

11 (33%)

Age, median (interquartile range) years

31 (29–33)

38.5 (34.25 -42)

Resident & Fellow Section (RFS) board, n (%)

27 (49%)

21 (54%)

Advanced Degrees, n (%)

 Doctor of Medicine (MD) only

35 (64%)

19 (50%)

 Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) only

1 (2%)

0

  + Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

9 (16%)

13 (34%)

  + Master of Public Health (MPH)

2 (4%)

2 (7%)

  + Master of Sciences (MSc)

5 (9%)

6 (16%)

  + other (Bachelor of Medicine [MBBS], Doctor of Medicine [DM], Master of Arts [MA], Master of Education [MEd])

2 (4%)

1 (3%)

Current Post-Graduate Year, n (%)

  

 1

3 (5%)

 

 2

2 (4%)

 

 3

33 (60%)

 

 4

9 (16%)

 

 5

5 (9%)

 

 6 or greater

3 (5%)

 

Years post residency, mean ± std

-

6.03 ± 4.1

  1. aSex and RFS board status were known for all mentees and mentors. N = 30 for mentor age