Table 3 Mean Pre and Post Program mRQI Individual Question Scores
From: A structured, journal-led peer-review mentoring program enhances peer review training
Question # | Question Topic | Pre | Post | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | Formal recommendation | 0.4 | 0.8 | < 0.0001 |
11 | Comment on interpretation of results | 2.1 | 2.8 | < 0.0001 |
2 | Separate comments for editor | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.0001 |
1 | Summary of the study | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.0003 |
7 | Strengths/weaknesses of methods | 2.6 | 3.1 | 0.0003 |
9 | Comments constructive | 2.8 | 3.4 | 0.0008 |
14 | Overall quality of review | 2.6 | 3.1 | 0.0027 |
6 | Originality of paper | 1.8 | 2.2 | 0.0040 |
3 | Comments divided/organized | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.0135 |
10 | Substantiate comments with examples | 2.7 | 3.0 | 0.1114 |
5 | Importance of research question | 1.9 | 2.3 | 0.1765 |
8 | Specific, useful comments on writing, organization, figures | 2.6 | 2.8 | 0.2695 |
13 | Overall tone | 3.6 | 3.6 | 0.3547 |
12 | Appropriateness of references | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.6313 |